There are two kinds of people in the world that kind of make decisions and find themselves unhappy and go on and make another decision because they insist on not being unhappy. And then there are those who find themselves in a similar situation but choose to remain there or feel powerless to do anything about it or but it or feel it’s what they deserve. Now a lot of people would say that the 1st example is an example is an example of a healthy individual but I say not necessarily. People who operate from the position that they insist on being happy are not necessarily healthy. AND their definition of happy in many cases is suspect anyways. People who insist on not being unhappy are very different from people who insist on being happy.
we are brought up in a society in America that conditions are mind to be that of a consumer that of someone who wants. We are more inclined towards wanting rather than giving. Even when we give we want in return. That’s my experience I don’t know about yours. It goes completely against the foundations of Christianity. Based on this fact alone I would imagine such things as poverty and Strife in relationships are probably at the heart of this this hypnotistic approach to life. This a** backwards approach to life. The foundations of Christianity resolve the world’s problems while man’s approach creates problems.
All my life has been more concerned about what other people think rather than what GOD thinks.
Some people have some pretty severe issues but they seem to know how to connect with other people. Some people don’t have any severe issues but they seem to not know how to connect with other people. Which people do you suppose go through life being connected to people? The ones with severe issues are the ones without severe issues?
Very few people would be willing to sacrifice their own happiness penis for someone else unless they truly love them. Many marriages crumble due to unhappiness because the love was this either week or or false pr [the individuals themselves] misguided