2 groups are fighting on the office inside of abortion. So one takes the position that the fetus is not alive yet and the other does. Now which do you suppose takes which argument or stands? Of course the one that wants abortions is going to try and stake that that growing in the womb of a woman and needing oxygen and needing oxygen and nourishment is not a life. Of course the ones that are against abortion are going to argue it is a life. But it’s interesting how human beings always depending on please depending on their position mount certain facts in order to win. We have 2 points here: the 1st is the agenda. 2nd is the ammunition to make the agenda of victory. But when do you see a person with a certain agenda also conclude that those ideation which would lend support to that agenda ARE WRONG? Almost across-the-board when a person has an agenda they will also adopt those things which support that agenda. Oftentimes irrespective of their own personal feelings or irrespective of whether or not there were not there is any truth to those things which support their agenda. Person/group “A” has agenda “X” person “B” has agenda “Y”. Almost systematically whatever position you take that serves your purpose or gain, people people will adopt those things in support of it whether they’re true or not or whether they go against their values or not depending on how important it is for them to have victory in the agenda versus their morals and values. Depending how much fear, ego, avarice is involved. Well the fetus is either alive or it’s not alive so somebody’s lying or in denial. Somebody’s using false facts to push their agenda. Human beings do this all the time. And of course we play the game who says you’re right and I’m wrongAnd of course we play the game where who says you’re right and I’m wrong. Being presumably all equal one person’s opinion is worth no more than the other and therefore the truth is a matter of individual opinion. Stupid Another lie, the life growing inside of the woman does not belong to both parents until it is born. It was created by both and therefore belongs to both. Ultimately to God of course.

What about when in a democracy the people get it wrong? Mark should the decision be overturned by a higher authority or allowed to stand? If the minority is right and the majority is wrong then what?

How many abortions are we talking about in this country every year? And how many of those are based on irresponsibility or preventability?

With most people who are being threatened to the gloves generally come off. They lose if only in part they’re adult sense of things. They lose their absolute sense of sane-approach as well.

People respect the law when it goes in their favor, you gotta respect the law when it doesn’t go in your favor don’t you?? Don’t you expect other people to respect the law when it goes in your favor and goes against their favor? I want to shoot this on the other foot…. As I said the other day man rarely takes the same position and attitude when the roles are reversed, when the positions are reversed.

People say abortion has been a constitutional right for 49 years. Well for 200 years in this country it hasn’t been a constitutional right. It’s been illegal.

So many changes in this country took place after the hippie movement. I’ll really rate after the hippie movement. You think the direction of this country should be reigned by by that period period and thinking?

Any decisions based on selfishness should be viewed with great… And the sad fact of the matter is that the majority of human beings make decisions based on self or selfishness not the whole.